Audio: A Cross-Focused Life

June 30th, 2009 § Leave a Comment

by Matthew Raley

"Crouching Woman With Crossed Hands," Kathe Kollwitz, 1921, Museum of Modern Art

"Crouching Woman With Crossed Hands," Kathe Kollwitz, 1921, Museum of Modern Art

There is a spiritual passivity in contemporary evangelicalism, an expectation that God will move our limp arms and legs. In this sermon, we see that the Bible is not a magic wand for our spiritual vitality. To read it actively, we need to uncover our need for the cross.

An Example of Romanticism

June 29th, 2009 § 1 Comment

by Matthew Raley

"Two Men Contemplating the Moon," Caspar David Friedrich, ca. 1825-30, Metropolitan Museum of Art

"Two Men Contemplating the Moon," Caspar David Friedrich, ca. 1825-30, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Someone defined romanticism as the mixture of beauty and strangeness, a combination that I certainly love in this painting.

Music That Edifies, and Music That Doesn’t

June 24th, 2009 § 8 Comments

by Matthew Raley

The word edify seems to be out of favor. It has the feel of an antique, and the stigma of obscure religiosity. When reaching for an equivalent, evangelicals often use encourage, and the substitution tells a story.

The words are similar.

To encourage is to hearten or animate — to give an emotional uplift when someone is down. Though one can encourage a group, we usually think of encouraging an individual, someone who needs a pat on the back.

Edification, like encouragement, has an emotional impact but is more specific about the purpose. To edify is to build, as both the Latin and Greek roots attest. Edification speaks of joining, cementing, adding, raising. It refers particularly to moral and spiritual improvement.

This is how Paul uses the Greek term (1 Corinthians 8.1): “Knowledge inflates, but love builds.”

Throughout the history of Western culture, sacred music has embraced the mission to edify. Congregations expected their music to cement them together in the praise of God, not just with people of one class but all classes, not just people of one generation but many generations. In the experience of being built together with other Christians, they expected to be improved. Music in worship was viewed as a corporate matter, as participation in a common sound.

This mission of connecting generations and classes was artistic. To achieve its goals, sacred music had tools to draw people in, like using familiar tunes from hymns and folk songs. It had other tools to propel people out of the familiar, not merely repeating tunes week after week, but resetting and combining them so that the folk elements acquired symbolic meanings. Until the late 1700s this music was not sold or performed outside the context of worship, and so had no commercial value.

It was crafted to evoke the spiritual zone where Christ’s people of all times and nations live.

Johann Sebastian Bach had a theology for this art — a view of how God uses music. He believed that the glory of God came upon his people whenever the congregation made music, a belief he based on the dedication of Solomon’s temple in 2 Chronicles 5.11-14. But for this art, Bach also had a cosmology — a view of how music operates in the physical universe. He believed that the planets and stars made literal music that human beings could join with their own sounds, all to God’s praise.

Bach’s music expresses this worldview. In the motet Jesu, Meine Freude (Jesus, My Joy), for instance, he takes a hymn that was familiar to his people, intersperses its stanzas with quotes from Romans 8, a familiar passage, and then propels the worshipers into God’s cosmos.

Notice that at the beginning the hymn is sung in ordinary chorale style (familiar), but that the second stanza (movement 3, 3:55) is more complex. The hymn tune is set in even more complex ways toward the middle of the motet. Notice also that the words from Romans 8.1 are set with five intricate, mutually-imitating lines. This counterpoint evokes the universe’s singing, the “music of the spheres.” (English translation below.)

Jesus, my joy,
pasture of my heart,
Jesus, my adornment
ah how long, how long
is my heart filled with anxiety
and longing for you!
Lamb of God, my bridegroom,
apart from you on the earth
there is nothing dearer to me.

There is therefore now no
condemnation to them
who are in Christ Jesus,
who wander not after the flesh,
but after the Spirit. (Romans 8, V. 1)

Beneath your protection
I am free from the attacks
of all my enemies.
Let Satan track me down,
let my enemy be exasperated –
Jesus stands by me.
Even if there is thunder and lightning,
even if sin and hell spread terror
Jesus will protect me .

This music doesn’t leave a worshiper in a familiar world. It connects worshipers to each other, to past generations of Christians, to the apostle Paul, to the physical universe (as they believed), and to God. It uses the familiar as a doorway into God’s larger world. It edifies. The music is powerful enough to connect with people today.

It is hardly news that contemporary evangelical music does not have a mission to edify. Evangelicals use commercialized pop modes almost exclusively, and the mission of this music is merely to encourage individuals.

Pop music certainly succeeds in its mission. But it has little communal value, since pop audiences have become narrower and narrower, representing the divisions of demographics rather than the unity of Christ’s Church throughout time and space. Some churches do well by singing a broad selection of pop styles, and there are possibilities for unity by using pop tools.

But there are two things evangelicals need to face about music. First, music has been given a spiritual mission by God, a mission that requires it do go further than encouragement. Second, the category of “what I like” will never edify. Giving people only what is familiar will make them smaller.

Sacred music needs to embrace its mission of love.

Poetry: “Men”

June 24th, 2009 § Leave a Comment

by Christopher Raley

They gather to build the fire,
men of older dreams, men of dead dreams.
Talk is out of mouths that hear to a world unseen,
and fingers feel with knowing eyes use of axe and wood.
Laughter comes just before the joke is punched.

Around them forest stretches and holds scared and quiet creature’s
frozen eyes, through gnarled manzanita and drooping hands of pine
hidden beholding heavy steps and strange, jagged rhythms of voice.

Beyond them forest stretches over patient deaths
of fallen trunks sprouting rising falls.
And peace is as many moments of silence
until fear of alien perseverance drives out to word.

So at last I left the moment’s sanctuary
to cross the dusty road where evening yet lingered
and their voices were soundings in deep water.

In the trees again I hurry to the call of men around the fire,
men of older dreams, men of dead dreams,
a circle of wrinkled palms yearning toward the flame.

Audio: A Kingdom-Scaled Life

June 23rd, 2009 § Leave a Comment

by Matthew Raley

"Splendid Mountain Watercolours," 1870, John Singer Sargent, Metropolitan Museum of Art

"Splendid Mountain Watercolours," 1870, John Singer Sargent, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Too often, Christians have their eyes on the foreground of life, fixated on immediate issues, rather than looking at their place in God’s larger work. In this sermon, we study how Christ calls us to live on a Kingdom scale, and how the Bible can help us do so.

Visual Fresh Air

June 19th, 2009 § 1 Comment

by Matthew Raley

"Garden at Sainte-Adresse," 1867, by Claude Monet, Metropolitan Museum of Art

"Garden at Sainte-Adresse," 1867, by Claude Monet, Metropolitan Museum of Art

I ran across this a couple days ago, and found my way back to it.

Jesus As Boyfriend

June 18th, 2009 § 4 Comments

by Matthew Raley

I’m going to say some things about evangelical worship music that cannot be said without seeming unkind.

I have no desire to be unkind — and that’s a change for me. When I was in high school and college, I got angry at church services frequently, both because of their musical quality and content. But most of that reaction was selfishness and pride, wanting everything to match my tastes. In the last fifteen years, I have become open to many styles of worship.

Still, not in anger but sorrow, I think evangelical music has failed. It has not united believers in local churches in common declarations of God’s glory, and the reasons for this failure have to do with truths about music that evangelicals have chosen to ignore.

Music is communal.

The act of making music is for bonding with others, not merely for pleasing oneself. A musician wants his expressions to be joined by those around him — joined through listening, certainly, but also through singing and moving. From the earliest times and in all cultures, music is for connecting.

Specifically, music is where a community’s rituals and moral vision fuse.

A ritual is a community’s repeated act that has acquired implicit meanings. Weddings and funerals are only the most obvious rituals. Sports, shopping, official decisions, and of course worship all have rituals as well. More often than not, music has a defining role.

A moral vision, the way I’m using the phrase, is a community’s view of what makes a good life. Music is one way communities express this vision. There’s a reason why spirituals sung by slaves are different from raps, a reason that goes beyond technology and even history. Among other things, the two musical genres express divergent moral visions of suffering.

So, with a bit a music, you encounter one culture’s view of good in life. And you react to it, positively or negatively. If you were to hear “The Sidewalks of New York” in its original 1890′s style, you would instantly react to the rituals and vision of good that it embodies.

Pop music is now too commercialized to unite diverse people.

This is just a fact of business: the target audience rules. Pop music is designed right down to the production values for that audience, to please that audience, especially by affirming its rituals and moral vision. Pop is designed to sell, not unite.

Those who market music are particularly concerned to avoid a negative reaction from the target audience. Radio people will tell you surprising things about where the dividing lines fall. For instance, people who love opera are not automatically the same as those who love “classical.”

Evangelicals have embraced pop music as a marketing vehicle for their message without stopping to ask what happens when people are connected not by participation but by consumption, or what happens when churches target certain people — that is, when they divide groups.

(By the way, consumers all around the world are rebelling against the music industry, because they are onto the calculation involved in the music itself. They are demanding authenticity, and they have the means to get it.)

Warning: this is the unkind part.

I think evangelical worship music most often mimics a girl’s vision of the good life, as packaged by pop music.

The calculation for megachurches has been like this: if pop music is the Way, the Truth, and the Growth, then the musical stream in which the church swims has to be non-threatening to most people. Anything from edgier pop music, or worse, old music, will send people running away with their hands over their ears.

That’s the reason for the Jesus As Boyfriend song. It’s non-threatening.

The typical contemporary worship tune is straight out of boyfriend ballads. It just is. And it has to be sung like a boyfriend ballad in order to be remotely convincing — with a certain breathy desperation.

The lyrics are also boyfriend ballad stuff. I need you. You are all I need. I’m desperate for you. Enough said.

The performers — and I’m pushing the edge of the unkindness envelope, and I’m sorry about it, I truly am — either act like girls seeking boyfriends, or like the boyfriends being sought, which is to say, cute.

(No offense to girls. Nothing wrong with girls. Nothing wrong with girls seeking boyfriends. Not trying to hurt girls’ feelings …)

The reason why worship music has failed to unite believers in a declaration of God’s glory is that, for the most part, it does not bother to try. It does not even attempt to cross generational or demographic lines. It either helps a church target a certain narrow group, or it helps a church be unobjectionable.

There. I said it. And I’m not done.

Poetry: “Oaks”

June 17th, 2009 § Leave a Comment

by Christopher Raley

Hills that were California brown
and held rich in folds of laden heat
and gave a scrub oak’s worth of shade
against sun and dust;

hills that were fire black
and held rich on islands in devastated calm,
having given oaks to bare the brunt
and wilt yellow who were too close to flame

are hills that are newly grown,
regenerate who owes to no man scars of her rebirth—
how she labored under God’s slow contract
and pushed up nutrient earth
around those preserved on malnourished soil.

So oaks are umbrellaed dots on hillsides,
amber as a row of open graves.
Theirs is not decided what may yet be life or death.

Audio: Three Characters To Follow

June 16th, 2009 § Leave a Comment

by Matthew Raley

"Christ's Entering Jerusalem," Andrea Boscol, 1595/99, Art Institute of Chicago

"Christ Entering Jerusalem," Andrea Boscol, 1595/99, Art Institute of Chicago

John 12 is the story of how God’s people reacted to God’s word. In this sermon, we study Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem and discover the ways three different characters responded to the Scriptures. We’ll be following these reactions through the rest of the chapter.

Books: Christ In Y’all, by Neil Carter

June 14th, 2009 § 1 Comment

scan0002

Christ In Y’all: Following Jesus into Community

Neil Carter (Ekklesia Press, 2008, 196 pp)

by Matthew Raley

In our crisis of identity as American evangelicals, we are several decades into a period of radical (root-seeking) experiments with local church life. Fellow believers are heading in many directions seeking community.

The church growth movement has fostered enterprises that are intimately in step with suburban consumerism. The Reformed movement is trying to revitalize body life through sharper doctrine. Many emergents have moved on from café churches to think in terms of missional communities.

Believers are amassing a lot of wisdom from these experiments. This period, though it is often painful and bewildering to me, will leave followers of Christ far healthier and with more varied skills for advancing Christ’s kingdom. I think the home church movement will prove to be a big contributor to all this wisdom.

That is why I was eager to read Neil Carter’s book, Christ in Y’all: Following Jesus into Community, and why I’m glad I did. I found much wisdom to keep working through our identity crisis.

Carter is focused on needs that, for believers, are primal. He asks, for example (p 30), “[H]ow many things do you do, either on your own or within your church, that honestly could not be done without God’s indwelling presence?” Concerning prayer, he observes (p 41), “Somewhere along the line we got a picture of God as a task-oriented Being who gave us prayer primarily as a way to make us as task-oriented as he is. But what would we be left with if we removed from our prayer lives all prayers that ask God to do something? We’d be left with simple communion.”

He also writes (p 45), “Spiritual formation is a collective endeavor [original emphasis]. It’s not about you, the individual, becoming more like Jesus. It’s about him coming to reside among the saints in their relationships with each other.”

The theology behind these statements is life-giving and biblical. Carter loves the Bible, and he communicates from the deep intentions of texts, not from idiosyncratic passions.

In addition, Carter makes penetrating observations about American life (p 39). “While declaring our independence from each other, we simultaneously mimic each other in everything from our clothing and our possessions to our language, our political views, and even our personalities. American culture may very well be the most advanced manifestation of this malady to date.”

This book is informed by experience. Carter and the brethren have taken these ideas and applied them seriously in a home church. He discusses how many of them intentionally live near each other, so that (p 158) they “often bump into each other and spend time together on the spur of the moment.”

At the heart of the book, and the experiences it reflects, is the reality that suffering with other believers, and being hurt by them, is essential to the Christian life. Chapters 5-6, in this respect, are worth the whole book, and give a call to sobriety that believers deeply need.

The only weakness of this book is common to literature from radical experimenters. In a word, judgmentalism.

Those who seek the root of matters and do things differently get stared at by the community’s worst face — the snide, dismissive, over-confident face. This experience stings, and it’s difficult to keep one’s writing and teaching from stinging back.

The edge of judgment on others’ efforts comes through in several of Carter’s paragraphs about stereotypical traditional church activities, staffs, buildings, etc. The verdict on p 168 is one of a few unsustainable pronouncements: “It took me a while to admit that ‘body life’ cannot survive long within the traditional church setting because these two things are antagonistic to each other.”

This doesn’t match my experiences. But such sparks keep the experimentation lively. I’ll put up with them to get Neil Carter’s wisdom.

Where Am I?

You are currently viewing the archives for June, 2009 at Tritone Life.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 282 other followers